Piers Morgan urges Queen to make Prince Harry and Meghan ‘plain title-less civilians’
Meghan Markle: Experts discuss Piers Morgan's comments
When you subscribe we will use the information you provide to send you these newsletters. Sometimes they’ll include recommendations for other related newsletters or services we offer. Our Privacy Notice explains more about how we use your data, and your rights. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Piers Morgan, 56, has reverted back to his seemingly favourite pasttime of blasting the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, as he urged the Queen to show Prince Harry and Meghan Markle “who’s boss” by stripping them of their titles, rendering them “plain title-less civilians”. In his latest column for the MailOnline, the outspoken host bashed the pair after Harry’s new interview with actor Dax Shephard for the Armchair Expert podcast, where he spoke about his “genetic pain” and wanting to “break the cycle” of “suffering”, referring to his own upbringing among other things.
It’s time she showed him that the Monarchy is bigger than his pathetically bruised, fragile and victimhood-dominated ego
Piers suggested Harry’s recent interview is unhelpful to the monarchy.
The journalist said: “The Queen is the head of that institution and its greatest protector.”
He added: “It’s time she showed him that the Monarchy is bigger than his pathetically bruised, fragile and victimhood-dominated ego and rendered him and Meghan plain title-less civilians.”
Reflecting on Harry’s interview, the former Good Morning Britain star branded the Prince a “spineless whiny cry baby” who is no longer the “courageous war hero” we once knew.
“Harry has lost his country, his dignity and now seems to be losing his mind too,” Piers snapped.
The Duke also made some comments about the First Amendment of the US Constitution during his chat with Shephard, referring to the time he and Meghan were staying at Tyler Perry’s home and had experienced lots of paparazzi.
He said in the interview: “I don’t want to start going down the First Amendment route because that’s a huge subject and one which I don’t understand because I’ve only been here a short time.
“You can capitalise or exploit what’s not said rather than uphold what is said.”
He then added as Shephard agreed: “I’ve got so much I want to say about the First Amendment as I still don’t understand it but it is bonkers.”
Piers soon took issue with his opinion, voicing his concerns and branding him clueless to what he was trying to say, and wondered what Americans would think about his words.
He penned: “But all that Americans will take away from Harry’s outburst about the First Amendment is a posh, privileged British royal slamming their Constitution and their unalienable rights to freedom of speech and expression.
“It takes an extraordinary amount of entitled arrogance to mock the most revered building block of your adopted country’s history.”
The presenter continued to slam Harry’s words as he argued it contained a double standard.
“He professes to care about free speech, but like with so many of his statements, his actions suggest the complete opposite,” he said.
“Harry was the kind of person that Sir Winston Churchill was talking about when he said: ‘Everyone is in favour of free speech.
“‘Hardly a day passes without its being extolled, but some people’s idea of it is that they are free to say what they like, but if anyone else says anything back, that is an outrage.’”
Source: Read Full Article